I’ve been on a bit of a political kick lately with my books. Right now I’m reading All the President’s Men
by Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein. The book is a good blend of hard
reporting and colorful details on Watergate. I think Richard Milhous
Nixon is the most fascinating character in the history of American
politics so it’s about time I read this and I hope the book delivers
scenes of Nixon flipping out and cursing and being Machiavellian. My one
qualm is that I skipped ahead and (spoiler alert!) the book stops
before Watergate hearings and Nixon’s resignation, which I would like to
have read more about. But I’m sure I can find other material on that
subject.
All the President’s Men had been
sitting in my basement for years since I bought it at a book sale so I
have no idea of the age of the note I found inside. It says, “This book
is biased and definitely unsuitable for impressionable minds, i.e.
liberals.” I can’t make out the signature but in my fantasy, Nixon wrote
it to an autograph seeker in a fit of pique.
As I am a sucker for alternate histories, I very much enjoyed Stephen King’s 11/22/63.
It is not a well-written book as King’s style includes heavy-handed
lessons on the less rosy side of the past and he tries to force Jake’s
life with Sadie to take on too much of a mythically perfect quality.
However, the concept is fascinating: A man travels through a wormhole
back to 1958 to prevent the Kennedy assassination. Predictably, the time
travel creates a future that is even worse. I was riveted by the
glimpses King provided of how U.S. history altered after Kennedy’s
escape from death.
For a more down to earth take on an alternate history, I loved Then Everything Changed.
Jeff Greenfield hypothesizes how history would have changed if chance
had altered three key events in politics: If John Kennedy had been
assassinated between his election and the meeting of the Electoral
College, if Robert Kennedy had survived his assassination attempt, and
if Gerald Ford had not made the debate gaffe that there was “no Soviet
domination in Eastern Europe” and won the 1976 election. Greenfield
presents a thoughtful, plausible and intriguing picture of how one
change in the chain of events changes the tug of war between factions in
politics and could have remade the country. Greenfield writes the
alternate histories as straight history. It’s a strange feeling, racing
through a textbook as if it were a thriller, eagerly getting details
about history that every school child in this alternate America would
have known.
Along the way, Then Everything Changed
offers little Easter eggs of familiar characters in history playing
different roles, such as the Clintons, Sandra Day O’Connor, John McCain
and George H.W. Bush. There’s even a bizarro Watergate-esque scandal
involving a Democratic administration. It seems the events of history
are destined to play out in one way or another as twisted versions of
events we learned about in school. The most bizarre alteration was the
series of events that led the Shah of Iran to die in a car accident in a
tunnel in Paris that directly echoed the death of Princess Diana.
The book 1Q84
was an alternate history of sorts, Haruki Murakami’s contemplative look
at a woman who finds her reality has “jumped the track” to a version of
1984 filled with more magical realism than the one she knew, ultimately
finding her long-lost childhood crush in the same strange world. I was
riveted to this story for awhile but there wasn’t much of a payoff at
the end, like a storm that threatens but ultimately passes over.
I was glad I finally got to read Marilynne Robinson’s Gilead,
which had been on my Amazon wish list for 27 years. It’s an elegiac,
moving book; a man’s letter to his young son meditating on the twists
and turns of his life. It gets especially emotional at the end as the
man confronts his illegitimate son.
Disco Bloodbath was
… I guess … fun? It’s James St. James’ account of his friendship with
fellow New York club kid Michael Alig, who killed and dismembered drug
dealer Angel Melendez, to whom he owed money. The story is also the
basis for the awful movie Party Monster. St. James’ narration is
appropriately informal and chatty for the subject matter but the
stylistic tricks annoyed me after awhile as too much of the book is in italics or boldface
or ALL CAPS for emphasis. In addition, all these people come off as
horribly unlikeable. They are so shallow that their shallowness forms a Möbius
strip that loops around in an endless cycle of shallow. With endless
depictions of K-holes, people ripping apart their own apartments in
search of forgotten bags of drugs and ending up with track marks and
sores, this book confirms once again that I’m never doing drugs.
No comments:
Post a Comment