As Seth MacFarlane started his Oscars monologue, I
remembered why I don’t like The Family
Guy. That was exhausting. We were at my parents’ and were going to leave
after the monologue and the first award but it just went on and on and on.
Captain Kirk was funny but the whole conceit just went on to the point where it
was excruciating and no longer amusing. Just like Family Guy.
The whole joke of MacFarlane singing tasteless songs and Kirk
preventing him from doing so was an example of a joke crawling up its own ass.
Even in joking about the tacky song, he still performed the tacky song. It was
just three layers too much of meta bullshit. For me, the best way to describe
the “I Saw Your Boobs” song was that I laughed but felt bad about laughing. I
didn’t realize til later that a lot of the women MacFarlane was poking fun at
showed their boobs in movies where they got raped, which kind of detracts from
the fun a tad.
I did enjoy the sock puppet re-enactment of Flight.
This whole thing begs the question of why the Academy Awards
people had MacFarlane on in the first place. They have had problems before with
hosts who were too irreverent and did not go over well with the audience. And
they knew MacFarlane would be too irreverent and they had him on anyway. And
then he just makes smartass jokes about how everyone will hate him. And it
becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy.
What in the name of God was the point? How about just
hosting the fucking show instead of making masturbatory skits about yourself?
If the organizers want to make the show less than three
hours, they need to drastically cut down on the dance numbers and such. I did
like the performance by the Les
Miserables cast. It made sense to do this at the Oscars because it’s from a
nominated movie. Similar to how artists at the Grammys will perform their
songs, at the Oscars, the actors should strut their stuff from their nominated
movies. But looking back at Chicago
and Dreamgirls as part of a tribute
to musicals was really a reach. Is anyone really saying, “Can you believe it’s
been 10 years since Chicago? Let’s
look back.” Ten years is an eye blink
to me. There are much more venerable movie musicals to salute.
I didn’t see the James Bond musical tribute. I heard Shirley
Bassey was great but I’m just annoyed than they didn’t ask Duran Duran to
perform as they did the greatest Bond theme ever. Sorry, Adele, but it’s a
fact.
So I really didn’t like those dance numbers during MacFarlane’s
monologue. This is not the Tonys and I have no desire to sit through this
person’s tapdance just because he likes to tapdance. That horseshit, not the acceptance speeches, is why the Oscars are
over three hours. Quit jerking off on stage and give out some Oscars. At least
things aren’t as bad as they were when Debbie Allen regaled us all with
interpretive dance.
Also, I’m bored out of my mind at the overanalysis of why The Onion calling Quvenzhané Wallis the C-word was wrong. The whole
thing boils down to “Don’t call a 9-year-old girl the C-word.” And that should
be it. It just isn’t hard to understand why it was offensive. I don’t need a 2,000-word think
piece on it.
But no. By all means,
let’s have every person with a pulse write a melodramatic take on why it was
wrong to say that word about that girl. Let’s all write so much about it that
it draws more attention to the infraction and that girl will have an easier
time of finding out what The Onion called her. (Yes, I realize I am also
writing about this but I do not have a national platform with which to bore
people; only a local platform for boredom.) Let’s have every journalist and
writer milk the shit out of this incident so they can have something to do. I
saw a writer at the Huffington Post react to a New York Times writer’s reaction
to the tweet and I just wanted to tell them that it just gets less and less
interesting the more the circle jerk of self-referential analysis continues.
The entire point of
this incident was that you shouldn’t call a kid the C-word. Must all these
commentators turn it into their graduate thesis?