At my job, the first thing
I do when I edit is formatting. Concentrating on the look of the article first
standardizes its appearance and removes distraction, making it easier to then
concentrate on the content. If the author has skipped two spaces after a
period, the first thing I do with that article is delete one space after every
period, like a factory worker picking out imperfections on an assembly line.
There is a study in Attention, Perception and Psychophysics noting
that leaving two spaces after a period helps with reading comprehension,
allowing the eye to move faster over text, but I’m not buying it. It should be
one space after a period. The new study may have attacked this question from a
scientific viewpoint but I will argue it from an aesthetic viewpoint. Leaving
two spaces just looks ugly. When I see two spaces, it just looks distracting to
me, like holes in a T-shirt.
The whole reason people
used two spaces in the first place was because of typewriters. With
typewriters, each letter fit in a slot of equal size. Since “w” took up all
that slot, there was less space around it than the slot around the letter “l.” The
spaces around letters were uneven by default, so two spaces after a period
stood out and let people know that was the end of the sentence. I think this is
why so many people use two spaces: they learned on typewriters or learned from
someone who learned on typewriters. It’s a style that seems as outdated to me
as using a slide rule. In proportional fonts, which we’ve had for the last 40
years or so, we don’t have that problem, since the letters bump right up
against one another. So we don’t need that extra space.
The study notes that
reading comprehension was not affected by punctuation spacing but participants’
eye movement suggested that two spaces after a period facilitated their initial
processing of the text. The effect in the study seems small to me, and it’s not
as if having one space after a period has a huge negative effect on reading
comprehension or speed, so why use two spaces if they look ugly on the page?
There is a big flaw in this
study in that researchers used Courier New, a typewriter font that was designed
for two spaces after a period, so of course two spaces would be more helpful.
But few people outside the government use this font, so I think it would be
fairer to conduct a test in a modern font. Amusingly, the online and PDF
versions of the study used one space after every period.
Keep in mind that this is
just one study in favor of two spaces after a period. On the other side, we
have people like me, who have worked for over 20 years in publishing and know
what is readable on the page. We also have publishers, the great majority of which
have decided one space after a period is the way to go. Find a professionally published
book or magazine or something online that uses two spaces after a period.
Outside of the government (which uses typewriter fonts) and some academic
materials, you won’t find much.
There must be a reason for
that and I think the fact that an overwhelming majority of professionally published
materials use one space after a period should overrule what people learned in
keyboarding class in 1990 and overrule the results of one study.
By the way, if you read
anything about this study and the headline is some variation of “Science proves
it,” it means the author has no idea how to write about a scientific study.
No comments:
Post a Comment