As Robert
Mueller said and implied over and over in yesterday’s testimony, read the
report. Since the Mueller report’s release months ago, it’s amused and appalled
me how many in Congress just haven’t read the whole thing. Politico interviewed
a bunch of representatives in the House and Senate on whether they’ve finished
the bedtime reading:
“What’s the point?” said Sen. Tim Scott
(R-S.C.). (Oh, just due
diligence, getting answers on whether the nominal head of the Justice
Department obstructed justice, reading up on the extent of Russia’s meddling in
our elections, etc.)
“It’s tedious,” said Sen. Lisa
Murkowski (R-Alaska).
(It’s part of your job and you frequently fly from Alaska to DC, so get on it.)
Rep. Collin Peterson (D-Minn.) also
said he hadn’t read the whole report. “It is what it is,” he said when asked
why. (Some sage and
helpful words there.)
Sen. Jim Inhofe (R-Okla.) said he
didn’t read the report and had no plans to start now. “We’ve been a little bit
busy,” he said. (Sorry
to bother you!)
“I didn’t have to read it. I lived it,”
offered Sen. Tim Kaine (D-Va.), who was Hillary Clinton’s 2016 vice
presidential running mate.
(No, you didn’t.)
This
is just a sampling and I’m sure there are many who have read the full report.
Elizabeth Warren has read it, but she strikes me as someone who would read this
on the beach (not an insult). Amusingly, Justin Amash read the report and was
so appalled that he left the Republican Party.
Well,
I read the whole GD Mueller report, and it’s mortifying that I’m more informed
on these important issues than many of our elected officials.
I
read most of it on a plane to and from San Antonio shortly after the report’s
release. Yes, it was tedious, but I wanted to be informed on this subject when
it comes up. I wanted to read the Thing itself rather than read about people
yelling about the Thing.
I’m
not trying to pat myself on the back. I’m a voracious reader and a lot of
people are not. I’m not critical of citizens who didn’t have the time or desire
to read a dry government report.
But
I’m sure as hell critical of those in the Legislative Branch who didn’t read
it. The Mueller report covers enormously important issues which, as a check on
the Executive Branch, it is their job to investigate. I’m sure they’re busy but
we all are. Don’t they think a comprehensive report on potential presidential
obstruction of justice could fit into their schedule? I don’t particularly want
to be represented by people who can’t read a book that is less than 500 pages.
You
read that everywhere after they released the report: 448 pages, two volumes.
You almost never read anything about the Mueller report without hearing those
daunting statistics. The text almost groans on the page: “448 paaaaaages. Two vooooolumes. Ugh!” Like it’s War
and Peace. After Mueller’s press conference in May, so many journalists
presented his words as “BOMBSHELL!” but they were already in the report, which
makes me think that a lot of the reporters—who are writers and presumably
capable of reading—didn’t read it either.
Again,
I’m not trying to be arrogant that I read a book. Maybe I just have more free
time than other people? I feel like I’m just an average person: I have a job
and a child and I’m not overwhelmed but I’m not idle. But I don’t have staff to
lean on as these elected officials do. If I read it, so could they. It’s their
job.
No comments:
Post a Comment