I’ve been
pleasantly surprised in the last few months by the relative popularity of Pete
Buttigieg as a presidential candidate. I figured a gay mayor of a small city would
be a longshot, but he’s making a bigger impression that expected. (He’s not one
of my top candidates but it’s still nice to see a gay candidate not get
dismissed immediately. Of course, for the
love of Christ, I’m voting for whoever the Democrats nominate for
president.)
Lately I’ve
read some commentary about how Buttigieg is apparently not quite gay enough for
some of the gays. A few months ago when the Buttigiegs appeared on a magazine
cover, dressed in khakis in front of their house, someone analyzed the photo
and said the two appeared conservative enough that the photo looked, I believe,
like “a photo of heterosexuality without women” or some nonsense. Then there
was a recent article by a gay writer who called Buttigieg “Mary Pete,”
speculated on his sexual position, basically said he was too boring, and since
he came out at 33, he might be inclined in the White House to act like a big
old gay whore in a belated adolescent period and endanger national security or
something. The article seems to be satire but I’m not sure because with the
very best satire, I find that the reader can take it at face value until
reading one subtle but unmistakable giveaway that the article isn’t to be taken
seriously, and I didn’t read that here.
Anyway, once
in awhile I will see commentary like this that gay people are “assimilating” if
they live their lives in the ways straight people always have. God knows that
no gay people should feel the need to hide. Our spiritual ancestors fought for
decades that people should be able to wear rainbow boas and parade and dance in
the streets. If that’s what you want, if that’s who you are, go for it. Drop
the mask and be who you are.
But what about
gay people who sort of live quieter lives because that’s who they are, and not
because they’re trying to assimilate? Aren’t such people allowed to be who they
are just as much as the louder people? People shouldn’t have to go to the other
extreme and slap on a mask of flamboyance if that’s not who they are.
I saw some of
this during the gay marriage debate when some gay writers opposed gay marriage,
saying basically, “Why would you want to do something so boring?” Like marriage
is some couch that’s too blah for their unconventional loft. (It sounds like
I’m making strawman arguments, and I don’t have sources here, but these are
just pervasive things I’ve heard through the years.) I respect all the gay
people who took risks in living unconventional lives to fight for parity with
straight people but from some quarters there seems to be disappointment with
those who chose to take advantage of that parity.
I’m not a
flashy person. I’m not wearing a mask to hide anything to make me acceptable to
straight circles; it’s just who I am. I’ve dabbled in excitement but in my
heart, at my age, I just want a nice quiet life with my family and to read a
few books. If that’s not gay enough for people, I don’t know what to tell ya.
No comments:
Post a Comment